Guns

Moderator: The Alternate Consultant

User avatar
snowman
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 16:21
Location: Brighton

Re: Guns

Postby snowman » Tue Apr 15, 2014 15:15

:butthead:

User avatar
drterror666
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 16:38
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Guns

Postby drterror666 » Tue Apr 15, 2014 15:23

You'll catch a chill... :twisted:
Hello little doggy,
My, you are a nice dog,
What did you just say then?
You could do some tricks! Oh, good, then will you show me?
My word that's a good one!
Would you like a cigarette?
No you can't, they're bad for you!

Image

User avatar
snowman
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 16:21
Location: Brighton

Re: Guns

Postby snowman » Tue Apr 15, 2014 15:53

...that's in the hands of the authorities now. Since when was mooning an arrestable offence??

User avatar
drterror666
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 16:38
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Guns

Postby drterror666 » Tue Apr 15, 2014 19:31

I never said it was.

On Land and in the Sea is still the best album, though.
Hello little doggy,
My, you are a nice dog,
What did you just say then?
You could do some tricks! Oh, good, then will you show me?
My word that's a good one!
Would you like a cigarette?
No you can't, they're bad for you!

Image

User avatar
snowman
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 16:21
Location: Brighton

Re: Guns

Postby snowman » Tue Apr 15, 2014 20:49

drterror666 wrote:
On Land and in the Sea is still one of the best albums, though.


Never a truer word said. Mwohahahaaaa! :rock:

psparky27

Re: Guns

Postby psparky27 » Tue Apr 22, 2014 23:08

Hes right :) Guns pales compared to Onland !

User avatar
snowman
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 629
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 16:21
Location: Brighton

Re: Guns

Postby snowman » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:05

psparky27 wrote:Hes right :) Guns is a tad more inventive than Onland !


This feels like a nice, exclusive club :D

User avatar
drterror666
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 16:38
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Guns

Postby drterror666 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 10:30

I think that people are attracted to the different eras of Cardiacs. I was more into the 'classic line up' era, my first ever Cardiacs purchases being the Big Ship mini LP and There's Too Many Irons in the Fire 12". I thought A Little Man... was a really good album, but On Land... was just the ultimate culmination of what they'd been building up.

Of course, a lot of people came in with the 'power quartet' era, of which Guns was the end result. So, everything Heaven Born... and Sing to God led to that album, which really does divide the fanbase. That's my theory, anyway.

It doesn't really matter what era you like, as long as you love Cardiacs.
Hello little doggy,
My, you are a nice dog,
What did you just say then?
You could do some tricks! Oh, good, then will you show me?
My word that's a good one!
Would you like a cigarette?
No you can't, they're bad for you!

Image

User avatar
Sterbus
mad completist
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 22:45
Location: Rome
Contact:

Re: Guns

Postby Sterbus » Thu Apr 24, 2014 00:34

drterror666 wrote:I think that people are attracted to the different eras of Cardiacs. I was more into the 'classic line up' era, my first ever Cardiacs purchases being the Big Ship mini LP and There's Too Many Irons in the Fire 12". I thought A Little Man... was a really good album, but On Land... was just the ultimate culmination of what they'd been building up.

Of course, a lot of people came in with the 'power quartet' era, of which Guns was the end result. So, everything Heaven Born... and Sing to God led to that album, which really does divide the fanbase. That's my theory, anyway.

It doesn't really matter what era you like, as long as you love Cardiacs.


This is true. From my experience I can say that people in their twenties and thirties (like me) mostly prefer the nineties stuff and the garage concerts, older people that were actually there when everything was really happening in real time for them are mostly in love with that first line-up. The nice thing is that they also love the other albums that they're not supposed to!

(Just like me, I absolutely love On land and in the sea, but I'd love to hear it remixed and maybe remastered, with stronger guitars and drums.... but I'm actually not even sure about that, cause I think that the first mix of Heaven Born and ever bright - the one with the guitars not on 11 - is really really really much better!!!)
anything anyplace anywhere for no reason at all
All my music here... http://sterbus.bandcamp.com/

User avatar
drterror666
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 1012
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 16:38
Location: Bristol, UK

Re: Guns

Postby drterror666 » Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:34

Sterbus wrote:
drterror666 wrote:I think that people are attracted to the different eras of Cardiacs. I was more into the 'classic line up' era, my first ever Cardiacs purchases being the Big Ship mini LP and There's Too Many Irons in the Fire 12". I thought A Little Man... was a really good album, but On Land... was just the ultimate culmination of what they'd been building up.

Of course, a lot of people came in with the 'power quartet' era, of which Guns was the end result. So, everything Heaven Born... and Sing to God led to that album, which really does divide the fanbase. That's my theory, anyway.

It doesn't really matter what era you like, as long as you love Cardiacs.


This is true. From my experience I can say that people in their twenties and thirties (like me) mostly prefer the nineties stuff and the garage concerts, older people that were actually there when everything was really happening in real time for them are mostly in love with that first line-up. The nice thing is that they also love the other albums that they're not supposed to!

(Just like me, I absolutely love On land and in the sea, but I'd love to hear it remixed and maybe remastered, with stronger guitars and drums.... but I'm actually not even sure about that, cause I think that the first mix of Heaven Born and ever bright - the one with the guitars not on 11 - is really really really much better!!!)


I never noticed that the mix on On Land... was lacking. It's always sounded perfect to me. I'll have to give it another listen, not that I need an excuse :wink: As for Heaven Born..., I'm just glad I bought it when it originally came out, before the disastrous remaster!
Hello little doggy,
My, you are a nice dog,
What did you just say then?
You could do some tricks! Oh, good, then will you show me?
My word that's a good one!
Would you like a cigarette?
No you can't, they're bad for you!

Image

User avatar
dogsetc.
.
Posts: 2841
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 14:03

Postby dogsetc. » Fri May 23, 2014 18:06

'Jitterbug (Junior is a)' Live Listen

This is really fascinating. I've only listened/watched a bit, but i suppose the thing is to have it playing along, as if you're in there with him. He's become quite sympathetic, or empathetic... i'm not sure if this is a prevailing genre of YouTubery, but it's new to me, and idiomatically quite delightful...

User avatar
Snardbafulator
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 1807
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 23:22
Location: A little house by the Whole World Window

Re: Guns

Postby Snardbafulator » Sat May 24, 2014 00:38

Wow, I never look at this forum anymore ...

I pretty much can see where everyone's coming from on Guns and it's entirely fair that Cardiacs fans have their particular favorite albums. I'm torn between On Land ... and Garage Concerts ... but then I smack my skull because how could I leave out Sing to God ...

Okay okay, StG had got to be my favorite ... but wait! ... D'oh !

I just don't like to see Guns get slagged for anything but the production -- and even there, distinctions should be made between the mix, which is excellent, and the mastering, which appears to be yet another victim (somewhat like the HB&EB remaster) of the Loudness Wars.

Guns, on its own terms, is an extraordinarily good album.

Bob
Deconstructing conventional wisdom since the birth of punk

psparky27

Re: Guns

Postby psparky27 » Sat May 24, 2014 00:57

There is no doubt it is a great album but its not the best but lets not get into that it just does have that "feel" yes great tunes , awesome lyrics....i could go on and on !

The thing is i went to gigs from 80-90-00 and the buzz .... the essence of what makes this glorious band special comes from them being a great live show and the time when that stage was briming to the full !

User avatar
Snardbafulator
Cardiacs Expert
Posts: 1807
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 23:22
Location: A little house by the Whole World Window

Re:

Postby Snardbafulator » Sat May 24, 2014 01:41

dogsetc. wrote:'Jitterbug (Junior is a)' Live Listen

This is really fascinating. I've only listened/watched a bit, but i suppose the thing is to have it playing along, as if you're in there with him. He's become quite sympathetic, or empathetic... i'm not sure if this is a prevailing genre of YouTubery, but it's new to me, and idiomatically quite delightful...

The word he was looking for to describe the final section ... argg ... is "modulatory."

I totally agree with you; it's a great way to share music. Of course it demands that you're familiar with the song which is easy enough if they leave the links they're listening to, but there's a problem with real-time descriptions in that the the describer winds up turning into me ... somebody who talks exclusively about the technical aspects without adding it all up which takes some reflection (I try not to write about music while listening for the first time).

The guy was technically competent as far as it goes ... but a 7???

That tune's at least an 8.5 if it's a 1.

Apparently he doesn't completely get Tim's aesthetic. But for a first-time listener, he was pretty open-minded, much more than I thought he'd be. I still wish he had more evocative language to describe that utterly unearthly final section, which is so gol-dang strange harmonically that it absolutely justifies making a loop out of it for 3+ minutes.

Bob
Deconstructing conventional wisdom since the birth of punk

psparky27

Re: Re:

Postby psparky27 » Sat May 24, 2014 02:12

Snardbafulator wrote:
dogsetc. wrote:'Jitterbug (Junior is a)' Live Listen

This is really fascinating. I've only listened/watched a bit, but i suppose the thing is to have it playing along, as if you're in there with him. He's become quite sympathetic, or empathetic... i'm not sure if this is a prevailing genre of YouTubery, but it's new to me, and idiomatically quite delightful...

The word he was looking for to describe the final section ... argg ... is "modulatory."

I totally agree with you; it's a great way to share music. Of course it demands that you're familiar with the song which is easy enough if they leave the links they're listening to, but there's a problem with real-time descriptions in that the the describer winds up turning into me ... somebody who talks exclusively about the technical aspects without adding it all up which takes some reflection (I try not to write about music while listening for the first time).

The guy was technically competent as far as it goes ... but a 7???

That tune's at least an 8.5 if it's a 1.

Apparently he doesn't completely get Tim's aesthetic. But for a first-time listener, he was pretty open-minded, much more than I thought he'd be. I still wish he had more evocative language to describe that utterly unearthly final section, which is so gol-dang strange harmonically that it absolutely justifies making a loop out of it for 3+ minutes.

Bob


Maybe his language was not that evocative because he did not find it unearthly ? I am not saying they are mutually exclusive just that I would find it hard to be evocative if reviewing a new disney film.They may just not be my bag baby !

As is this track to me to be honest. I wish he had been sent a much better track. 8 tops.